We're at Unleash, Paris, 20-22 October 2026See us there →
person_celebrateRolemapper Quick Win

What is job levelling and why is it important?

We explore the benefits of job levelling, the different methods that can be used, some of the key levelling frameworks (such as WTW and Radford Aon), and a high-level approach to implementing a job levelling framework.

Trusted by leading organisations worldwide

Siemens
BBC
Comcast
Zoom
Flutter
Download the Guide

Job levelling and evaluation, built for what's coming next

Why “that’s just what the market pays” is no longer defensible
What methodologies are the best for the AI-enabled era of work
What it takes to build a scalable and connected system
person_celebrate RoleMapper Quick Win

Job Levelling in 3 Mins

What is job levelling?

Job levelling, also referred to as job evaluation or job classification, is a structured process used by organisations to evaluate and categorise roles based on their responsibilities, required skills, and impact on the organisation. Job levelling can be used to provide clarity around career progression, to ensure equitable pay practices and to align roles with organisational goals. From an employee perspective, it helps to make clear what is expected of them in a particular role, and how their work and responsibilities fit into the broader company structure.

Why is Job Levelling Important?

Job levelling is important for organisations for many reasons:


  • Fairness and transparency of pay – A robust job levelling framework helps ensure that employees are compensated fairly based on their role's complexity and contribution. This in turn helps with compliance with pay equity and pay transparency legislation.

  • Clear career paths – With a levelling framework in place, organisations can provide employees with visibility of career paths so they gain an understanding of the steps needed for advancement. Job levels can also help attract candidates to an organisation by offering clear career progression opportunities.

  • Talent management – HR teams can better manage job descriptions, performance metrics, and training needs by referencing standardised levels. Job levelling also supports succession planning by providing insights into potential successors ready to move up a level.

  • Organisational consistency – Job levelling creates uniformity in job titles, and helps employees and managers have a clear understanding of job expectations and responsibilities at each level. It is also easier to understand how different roles relate to each other.

  • Consistency across HR practices – Job levelling creates a common language to describe roles across an organisation. This can then streamline decision-making processes across recruitment, performance management and reward.

  • Skills-based approach – Job levelling supports a skills-based approach by providing a structured framework to define roles and responsibilities based on required skills.

The Cost of Chaos

Outdated tools create inconsistencies, bias and governance risks.

Fragmented and outdated job data

Solution: a structured, agile job architecture

We bring structure to your job data and skills chaos, making decisions around performance and progression more consistent, transparent and fair.

Misaligned, manual job levelling

Solution: job levelling integrated into job creation workflows

The defensibility of a point-factor methodology with the simplicity of a levelling framework. Built against global legislation, equal pay case law and bias research from day one.

Disconnected systems with poor pay governance

Solution: streamlined control of your full job architecture

RoleMapper integrates with your existing HR systems and adapts to your processes — no need to overhaul how teams work.

Learn more ↓

"RoleMapper saves us a ton of time and brings the governance we need as a comp function."

Todd Reeves - Chief People Officer, Zoom

Job levelling and evaluation that's defensible and scalable

The defensibility of a point-factor methodology. The simplicity of a levelling framework. Built for pay transparency from day one — and connected to your job architecture, skills and HCM.

  1. 1

    Grounded in global legislation and equal pay case law

    Designed against global pay transparency legislation from day one. Factor design was shaped by equal pay case law.

  2. 2

    Built on science. Designed for how work is evolving

    Drawing on the latest work design and behavioural science research. Critical thinking, influence without authority and people leadership captured as distinct factors.

  3. 3

    Consistent methodology. Flexible for your organisation

    The underlying scoring is consistent — but language, weighting and career track structure can be adapted to your context.

wand_stars

Let RoleMapper do the heavy lifting

A methodology built for the world of work today. Not the world of work fifty years ago.

Learn more

Job Levelling Methods

There are several different job levelling methods used by organisations, which range from very structured processes based on quantitative data to more informal, less structured systems that utilise qualitative data. Here are some of the most common:

In this method, positions are directly assigned to predetermined grades or salary levels based on a quick comparison with benchmark positions. Job descriptions are compared to established role profiles and then placed in the most appropriate grade or level.

This method is faster and less resource-intensive than other job levelling methods, making it particularly useful for smaller organisations or when evaluating new positions. However, it can be less precise and more subjective than other levelling methods, potentially raising concerns about accuracy and fairness.
Job classification is a more structured approach which involves systematically categorising positions into grades based on predefined criteria. In contrast to job slotting, it uses a more detailed analysis of job characteristics against established grade definitions.

This approach can produce greater consistency across similar roles, a clearer organisational structure, and standardised pay ranges.

The drawbacks are that implementation can be time-consuming, while the potential rigidity in level definition can make it a challenge to accommodate unique roles. It's also a system which requires regular reviews to maintain relevance.
Factor comparison is a quantitative job levelling method that evaluates jobs by comparing them against factors or criteria (such as skills, effort, responsibility, and working conditions). It involves evaluating jobs on a factor-by-factor basis.

This is a more analytical and detailed job levelling approach which better supports pay equity and pay transparency. It's also more effective for unique jobs because each role is considered individually.

The potential downsides are that factor comparison can be complex, time-consuming, and requires significant expertise to implement. It can also be expensive to maintain, and HR teams may face resistance due to its complexity.

Key Job Levelling Frameworks

Many job levelling frameworks have been developed – based on some of the methods outlined above - to help organisations with job levelling. Here are some of the key ones:

The Radford job levelling framework is a globally recognised system which categorises jobs into six levels: Entry (P1), Developing (P2), Career (P3), Advanced (P4), Expert (P5), and Principal (P6). These levels are applied across career tracks such as Professional, Support, Technical, and Managerial roles, allowing organisations to differentiate between individual contributors and managerial positions while maintaining internal equity and market alignment.

Radford evaluates and levels jobs using key factors including:

  • Knowledge and Skills: The depth and breadth of practical and theoretical expertise required for the role

  • Impact: The role's influence on business outcomes, including its effect on projects, strategies, and organisational objectives

  • Level of People Management: The extent of responsibility for managing teams or individuals

  • Financial Responsibility: Accountability for budgets, revenue generation, or cost control

The Willis Towers Watson (WTW) Global Grading System (GGS) is a robust job levelling framework operates on a scale of up to 25 grades. The framework uses a two-step process: banding and grading. Banding places jobs within a hierarchical structure based on their contribution to the organisation, while grading evaluates roles against seven key factors:

  • Job Functional Knowledge: The expertise required for the role

  • Business Expertise: Understanding of the organisation's operations and industry

  • Leadership: The degree of influence and decision-making authority

  • Problem Solving: Complexity of issues the role addresses

  • Nature of Impact: The scope and significance of the role's contributions

  • Area of Impact: The breadth of influence across the organisation or externally

  • Interpersonal Skills: Communication and collaboration requirements

The Korn Ferry Hay Method of job levelling is another widely used framework for evaluating and comparing job roles across organisations. It employs a point-factor methodology to assess jobs based on three core elements:

  • Know-How: Measures the technical, planning, organising, and interpersonal skills required to perform the job competently

  • Problem-Solving: Evaluates the complexity of challenges the role must address and the level of innovation or analysis required

  • Accountability: Assesses the degree of responsibility for outcomes, including decision-making and influence on organisational results


Each of these elements is scored using detailed charts, and the total score determines the job's level within an organisation's grading or levelling structure. The method also incorporates checks to ensure logical relationships between roles in hierarchical structures, such as comparing knowledge depth and management breadth between a role and its supervisor.

See how RoleMapper makes this easy ↓

Design, manage, and scale your organisational structures—without spreadsheets or consultants.

✓

See it in action

A live walkthrough of the Job Architecture Data Transformation Service using real-world examples.

✓

Understand the outputs

See the job profiles, job descriptions and architecture structures we deliver and how they connect to your wider people strategy.

✓

Get a clear next step

Leave with a practical view of what a project would look like for your organisation, timeline and all.

Book a DemoBook a 15-Minute Demo

Trusted By

Siemens
BBC
Comcast
Zoom
Flutter

RoleMapper Resources

person_celebrate

Thought Leadership Hub

Everything you need to go further. Guides and insights to support your Job Levelling and Job Architecture journey.

Job Architecture
Job Levelling & Evaluation
Skills
Job Descriptions
person_celebrateRoleMapper Quick Win

Why is Job Architecture important?

Creating and maintaining a dynamic, future-proofed job architecture is a strategic imperative for all organisations.

Read more
person_celebrateRoleMapper Quick Win

Why is Job Levelling important?

We explore the benefits of job levelling and the different methods that can be used.

Read more
person_celebrateRoleMapper Quick Win

Building a Skills Framework for a Transparent, Fair Organisation

A skills framework is a structured way of defining the capabilities required to perform work and deliver outcomes across an organisation.

Read more
person_celebrateRoleMapper Quick Win

What is Job Description Software?

Job descriptions sit at the centre of every workforce decision — from hiring and pay to planning and progression. But managing them effectively across a growing organisation is a challenge.

Read more

Resources

Everything you need to go further. Guides, demos and insights to support your job architecture project.

GUIDE

The Job Levelling & Evaluation Guide

Job Levelling & Evaluation in the Era of Pay Transparency & AI.

Download now
ON-DEMAND

Masterclass

Job architecture in practice. Watch the on-demand masterclass.

Watch now
BLOG

Our Thinking

Why job architecture transformation should take weeks, not years.

Read more
VIDEO

Explainer

See exactly how our Job Architecture Data Transformation Service works.

Watch now
CASE STUDY

Zoom Case Study

How we transformed Zoom's job architecture. Fast.

Read more